The Bay is an inappropriate place for development
- This is Bay fill not infill. Real infill development doesn't need new streets, let alone the 223 acres of streets in Cargill/DMB’s plan. The same goes for transit, sewage and the other necessary infrastructure. None of that infrastructure currently exists on these salt ponds.
- Housing is not permitted on this sea-level, bayfront property. The site is zoned “Tidal Plain,” which allows salt production, parks and other open space uses, not housing.
- Redwood City does not have water to support this development. Cargill/DMB proposes a controversial, complex, unprecedented and legally questionable transfer of southern California agricultural water to support the development. In the words of California State Assemblymember Jared Huffman, Chair of the Committee on Water, Parks and Wildlife, "It is neither responsible nor realistic for DMB Associates to premise a huge urban development in the Bay Area on an elaborate scheme to import Kern County water."
- Housing should not be built on a floodplain. Sea levels are projected to rise five feet or more in the next 90 years. Cargill/DMB expresses skepticism about sea level rise, and proposes to build a less protective levee, which preserves views for residents. They say the levee can be raised decades later (after the developer is long gone), if the seas really do start to rise. (Infrastructure Report; Appendix A.)
In Depth
Take Action: Stop Cargill from filling the Bay!
View our Flickr photo set on the Redwood City Salt Ponds
Watch the Virtual Saltworks Google Earth movies by a Redwood City resident
Key News Articles
- Redwood City salt ponds not the right place for massive development, San Jose Mercury News
- Redwood City launches environmental study of Saltworks plan, The Daily News
- A traffic nightmare for the Peninsula, Menlo Park Almanac
- Major Quake, Flood Could Spell Disaster for Saltworks Project, The Daily News
- Huge Development on Salt Ponds Would Be Terrible, San Jose Mercury News
- Essential Fact: Bay Can't Take Building, SF Business Journal
- Opposition Mounts to 12,000-home development, San Jose Mercury News
- Environmentalists, Political Leaders Push to Derail San Francisco Bay Saltworks Development, The Sacramento Bee
- Environmentalists fight Redwood City project, San Francisco Chronicle
- This Week in Northern California, July 2009 (video)
- 'Smart growth' or environmental mistake on Redwood City waterfront?, San Jose Mercury News
- Message to Cargill: You can't pave our Bay, OpEd, San Francisco Examiner
- Warming, pollution, development threaten bay, San Francisco Chronicle
- Restoring wetlands is good for business, San Francisco Business Times
Opposition statements
- Redwood City salt ponds not the right place for massive development, Editorial, San Jose Mercury News
- Against the Bay, Editorial, San Francisco Chronicle
- Elected Officials Letter to Redwood City Council
- Audubon California (2009 statement)
- The Nature Conservancy (2010 statement)
- Pacific Merchant Shipping Association (2009 op-ed)
- The Peninsula Democratic Club (2010 statement)
- Point Reyes Bird Observatory - Conservation Science (2009 letter)
- Sierra Club (2008 & 2010 resolutions)
- West Bay Sanitary District (2007 resolution)
- Woodside Atherton Garden Club (2009 statement)
By completing this form, you agree to receive free Bay updates and alerts from Save The Bay.
